Research Project
Central Thesis Among his findings on user behavior:
As newspapers work to meet the challenges of attracting readers, editors and designers are faced with making bold decisions that could bring newspaper usability design closer to that of the Web and television. The central questions are what common behavioral characteristics do viewers, readers and users share that transcend media and how can those commonalities affect newspaper design?
Introduction
On airplanes, business travelers read copies of USA Today, gathering quickly a sense of the news of the day. Eye-catching color photographs, illustrations and graphics coupled with three to four inches of text efficiently convey information in an entertaining manner.
Users of the Website, http://www.msnbc.com click on images, hypertext, video and even links to original sources. The user is offered a variety of methods for accessing information.
On television, the Cable News Network (CNN) provides viewers choices as well. They watch abbreviated versions of the day’s top stories on the “Headline News Channel”, or opt for extended coverage and analysis on CNN.
According to extensive studies conducted by the Readership Institute, of Northwestern University, these three groups, the viewers, the readers and the users share common behavioral characteristics that allow usability experts and designers opportunities to exploit those commonalities.
Expectations of behavior determine design
George Washington’s Farewell Address, at 1,086 lines, took up full pages in the newspapers of the day including, the Philadelphia Gazette. (Ellis, The Founding Brothers. Pp.150-151. Alfred Knopf. 2000)
Washington and his staff expected that readers would read the address in its entirety. There were no “break out boxes”, ‘quote-outs” or illustrations of the President’s staff. Yet, readers devoured each and ever word. Here is the abstract of the address as it appeared in New England’s The Chronicle, a leading newspaper.
No newspaper of the Millennium could dare rely upon text alone to engage or retain readers. Instead, they rely upon the results of countless user research surveys and usability studies that help determine what readers will accept. (http://www.readership.org). What has happened to change the relationship between the reader and the printed page? Some researchers believe the major shift in reader expectations and behavior occurred with the public popularity of television.
No longer were they “readers”; now they were viewers. Rather than having the ability to ignore the advertisements as readers of printed newspapers did, these advertisements were inserted into the content of the program. Viewers had little choice but to watch a program in segments prescribed by the programmers and advertisers.
Thus, the behavioral shift occurred that led viewers to accept smaller amounts of information coupled with images. For the first time, more than the sense of sight was stimulated. Viewers could see, hear and feel along with the characters created on the screen.
Advertisements brought another dimension to the experience for the viewer. These, too, evolved over the decades to become another form of entertainment and information, which further eroded view attention spans and changed the behavior patterns as people interacted with the screen. This required content producers to develop new methodology to encourage viewer retention and return visits. (http//utpress.utoronto.ca/journal/ejournal/simile/accessed March 5, 2005).
According to Rebecca Dumlao’s research into critical viewer thinking and analysis of content, experts in mass media studies utilize the concept of “framing” to synthesize the relationship between content and viewer perception. Developed in 1974, framing allows content producers to pay careful attention one portion of a topic while ignoring another. For example, hypothetically speaking, a producer might divide Washington’s Farewell Address into thematic segments rather than presenting an unedited version to an audience.
Since its inception, framing has been used so consistently among television program producers that it is inherent in the design of both programming and advertising.
Half hour documentaries on national networks are broken into segments, each with a theme that focuses the viewers’ attentions on one element of the information. Other information is often left out or ignored in favor of keeping with this pattern.
For example, a recent segment (Feb. 4, 2005) on ABC’s 20/20 dealt with the safety of organic food. Critics charged that producers failed to tell viewers fully about the credential of their expert. The network never responded to the criticism.
Framing is one methodology incorporated into information presentation to disseminate information in a palatable manner.
According to research by the Readership Institute, audiences have come to expect an “experience” with their chosen medium. In a study conducted in 2003,a generation of younger readers, raised on television’s 15 second commercials,14.5 minute content segments and rapid fire visual edits, expect to be ‘engaged” rather than “told” information. Additionally, they look for a personal interest in the information. In other words, if the information does not matter or evoke a personal response, it is not useful.
(http://www.readership.org/new_readers/data/all_experiences.pdf. Accessed March 30, 2005)
The Readership Institute and 100 newspapers nationwide participated in the study to develop a set of “key experiences” that readers found most important. The term “ readers” was further quantified to define sub-groups that included those who described themselves as light to moderate readers, heavy readers or non-readers. They were from every socio-economic group as well.
In summary, the study found that readers wanted content that dealt with personal interests.
These included such subjective answers as:
· Gives me something to talk about
· Makes me smarter
· Looks out for my personal and community interests
· Value
The survey also asked about inhibitors to a positive reader experience. Surprisingly, one at the top of the list was “too much information.” (http://www.readership.org/new_readers/data/all_experiences.pdf. Accessed March 30, 2005)
How would the first U.S. President’s Farewell Address fared with a 21st century audience in its purest form – un-framed and without any personal caveats to its audience?
Behavior patterns move to the Internet
An entire field of study has been built around the term “usability.” At its core, the term refers to how easily and how efficiently a person can use a medium, whether it is a telephone or laptop computer.
According to usability expert Jakob Nielsen, “Usability is a necessary condition for survival on the Internet. (Nielsen, Jakob, “Usability 101” in Alertbox Newsletter, 8 Nov 2004. Accessed 7 March 2005 http://usenet.com/alertbox)
Although much of usability is subjective in nature, given the unique qualities of individuals, Nielsen offers one consistency. People leave a Web site when they find it difficult to use or face challenges accessing the information for which they are searching.
The key components of usability, according to Nielsen are:
· Learnability – how easy can users access information on their first visit
· Efficiency- after learning, how quickly can users master the basic tasks
· Memorability – after an absence in using the medium, how well do users retain the ability to navigate
· Errors- how many? How to users recover?
· Satisfaction – was the experience a pleasant one, encouraging a return use.
(Nielsen, Jakob, “Usability 101” in Alertbox Newsletter, 8 Nov 2004. Accessed 7 March 2005 http://usenet.com/alertbox)
Using these attributes, Internet programmers and Web site designers develop sites that attract and retain users or send them clicking away in frustration.
Therefore, good design positively exploits these attributes to the advantage of the site and the benefit of the user.
Web users who depend upon the transparent design of a site to help them access information quickly are often unaware of the research that has gone into developing and framing information to help the user.
According to another Nielsen study, users and viewers of television programs share some common behavior responses, building upon their skills developed in other media.
Television viewers are able to suspend their belief system that tells them the images they are watching are real.
“You are not looking at people, you are looking at pictures of people, in the form of glowing dots on a picture tube,” Nielsen stated in his report, “Authentic Behavior In User Testing.”
(Nielsen, Jakob, “Authentic Behavior in User Testing,” Neilsen Norman Group, 14 Feb. 2005. Accessed 4 March 2005 http://usenet.com/alertbox.)
Nielsen states that usability studies show viewers come to believe the scene is real and therefore, they engage with the action on the screen. He said the only time the engagement fails is when viewers must actively work to suspend belief or when they find the scene so unrealistic they do not ever make the initial interface.
This is true of Web users as well. Nielsen research indicates that people who visit the Internet share characteristics with the viewers of television.
In “Acting on User Research,” Nielsen recommends that an understanding of online user behavior is the first step in building an effective design.
· Users accept information presented in small segments
· Build on established behavior patterns, such as the willingness of people to suspend their belief to accept a screen of dots as reality.
· Users “scan’ rather than read actual words
· Users look for the simple patterns they can master and recall
· Users access information in a non-linear pattern.
(Nielsen, Jakob, “Acting on User Research,” Neilsen Norman Group, 8 Nov. 2004. Accessed 4 March 2005
The case for Web design to improve readership in newspapers
The Shelby Star is a 16,000-circulation community newspaper that has successfully published a daily paper (including Sundays) for over a century. Headquartered in Shelby, the county seat of Cleveland County, N.C., the paper can boast that it is the only daily paper to serve the people of the county. At full staff, The Star newsroom employs 19 people, including the editor, managing editor, Web master and a graphic designer.
The paper maintains a loyal readership through its attention to community priorities. These include local school news, church activities and high school and college sports.
To cap that, The Star consistently wins awards for its aggressive reporting, including first place from the N.C. Press Association in 2004 for General Excellence.
For the last year, the newsroom staff, led by its editor, has been engaged in learning how to improve the design and coverage. Utilizing the same research skills the staff uses to develop stories, they are working to make The Star into a reader-friendly, “news that the readers care about” paper, without sacrificing journalistic integrity.
To begin the work, teams analyzed each section of the paper, developed suggestions for innovation, based on the extensive studies complied by the Readership Institute that formulated a set of “Key Reader Imperatives for Growing Readership.”
(McCauley, Todd and Nesbitt, Mary, “consumer Readership Behavior Study” in Readership Study, (Northwestern University Kellogg Institute of Media, Feb. 2004) Accessed 27 Feb. 2005) http://www.readership.org/consumers/building/imperatives/data/Revised%20Report.pdf
At the Star, while the redesign is still underway, this imperative has taken on a major role in the planning, writing and design of content.
In addition to the kinds of stories that a paper covered and the approach to customer service, one of the top four imperatives addresses navigation. It expressly indicates that readers want a newspaper that is easier to read and offers more information in smaller portions. It also calls for repetition of key information throughout a story. For example, an article about changes in city wide garbage pick up would have been “straight copy”, a photo and possible a phone number to call.
Under the “make the paper easier to navigate” imperative, this same article became a half page, filled with shaded boxes where readers found contact numbers, lists of allowed refuse. They also saw several photographs that contained a summary of the new regulations. The body of the article contained frequently asked questions and answers.
Often, the Web master, graphic designer, photographer, copy editor and reporters meet to discuss how to execute content. The result often appears as a print version of a Web page. The overall changes account for readers who behave very much as Web site users. According to the results of one of the studies from the Readership Institute, and The Star has put this information into practice, the major behavior patterns of readers share similarities with Web users.
They scan for content, looking first at headlines, then graphics and photographs.
They rarely read beyond the first thee inches of long copy.
They jump between sections of the paper, most often reading stories and sections out of order.
The amount of time a reader devotes to a specific page in the paper is no more than ten minutes.
Therefore, content developers and designers need to change the fundamental design of information presentation to work to engage the reader for as long as possible.
Conclusion
Those business travelers reading USA Today and the future readers of The Star may never be aware that the behavior they display in accessing Internet sites is so closely aligned with the behavior of reading a newspaper. However, the usability experts and designers have long since made the connection and are successfully utilizing these characteristics to help attract readers and visitors to a corporation’s Web site.
The question remains. Just a television heralded an massive behavior shift that has yet to be concluded, how much impact will the Internet play in what we have taken for granted for more than four centuries – the simple interface of reader to page?
That remains to be seen.
